rubin5
Journal / Money

Your fundraising trailer is already a line in the budget.

Almost everyone I talk to treats the fundraising trailer as an expense they have to conjure money for. It is not. On the industry's own budget template it is a pre-existing account with a dollar figure already sitting next to it.

This matters more than it sounds. If the trailer is a discretionary purchase, then paying for one means finding new money, and finding new money means a conversation nobody wants to have. If it is a budgeted line, then paying for one is an approval. Same money, completely different conversation.

So here is the actual sheet.

The account is 1500

The International Documentary Association publishes a budget and schedule template that a great many funders expect to see filled in. In the current version, rewritten for 2025, the fundraising sample has its own block:

AcctLineQtyBudgeted
1500Editing & post-production for sample teaser$4,715.15
1510Editor (contractor)1 wk$3,000
1520Assistant editor0.6 wk$900
1530Edit room rental and editorial expenses1 wk$500

That is the number. Not a guess, not a market rate somebody quoted at a panel. It is what the template your funder is reading already says the piece costs.

Why this is worth knowing even if you never hire me. When you ask a funder for money for a trailer, you are not asking them to believe in a new expense. You are asking them to release an allocation they already made. Point at the account number. It changes the temperature of the room.

The line that will get you caught

There is a trap here, and I nearly walked into it myself.

For years everyone in this corner of the business quoted the same line: account 1060, editor, two weeks, $3,000 a week, $6,000. It is real. It is verbatim correct. And it is on a document from roughly 2019 that has since been superseded. In the current template, account 1060 does not exist.

Worse, the current template does still contain a two weeks at $3,000 line totalling $6,000. It is account 10050, and it sits under promotional materials. It is the promo trailer for a finished film, and the sheet itself flags it as excluded from the production budget by some funders. It is not the fundraising sample.

So if somebody quotes you $6,000 and calls it the standard fundraising sample line, they are either reading a document that expired or reading the wrong row. Open the sheet. It takes a minute.

The four lines sitting right next to it

This is the part almost nobody uses. The sample teaser block does not sit alone. Adjacent to it on the same template, all budgeted, all in development:

AcctLineBudgeted
1310Written treatment / proposal$2,500
1320Fundraising / pitch deck$1,500
1330Budget and schedule$2,500
1340Cashflow$1,000
10010Poster / key art design$4,000
7210Main title design$4,000

Your whole development package is on that sheet, pre-priced, by the same body your funder trusts. Most filmmakers apply for the teaser money and leave the treatment and deck money sitting there unclaimed, then pay for those things out of pocket later. You do not have to do that.

The strongest single piece of evidence

If you want proof that the trailer is standard rather than a nice-to-have, it is not from the IDA. It is from ITVS, whose template has a section literally titled ITVS Required Items:

1107   Trailer   1   allow   4,000   4,000 ITVS budget template, under "ITVS Required Items", total $6,135

The trailer is $4,000 of the $6,135 they require. Sixty-five percent of everything they mandate is the trailer. It is not a garnish. In their view it is most of what development is.

One caveat, and it is a big one. Do not go to ITVS for this money right now. All four of their programs read "not currently accepting applications," and they have publicly delayed the relaunch of their development fund. The $1.1 billion CPB rescission is working its way through the whole public media funding chain, so treat Black Public Media, Latino Public Broadcasting, CAAM and Vision Maker with the same caution until they say otherwise. Use line 1107 as evidence of the standard. Do not use it as a map to money.

What this means for what you should pay

I will be direct, since the whole point of this piece is to be. I charge $5,000 for a first project. That number is not reverse-engineered from what I want to earn. It sits against the $4,715 block above.

Which is the actual argument: at roughly the budgeted level, hiring someone is an approval. Above it, you have to go find money, and that is a fundraise to pay for the thing that does the fundraising. That is a bad shape.

The other direction matters too. If you are working off a Catapult grant at $25,000 total, or a Chicken & Egg development grant at $20,000, then $5,000 is a fifth of everything you have. That is real and I do not pretend otherwise. It also means anyone quoting you five figures for a pitch tape is quoting more than your entire development budget, and you should treat that as the signal it is.

Know the number before you take the call. That is all this piece is for.

Sources. Figures read from the IDA's current template, published December 2024 as part of A Fresh 2025 Introduction to Documentary Budgeting and Scheduling by Robert Bahar, and from the ITVS budget template. The superseded account 1060 appears on IDA's older sample budget PDF, still downloadable, no longer current. Checked July 2026. Templates get revised. Open the live file before you quote anything in this piece, including me.
Next: the markets that require one Start a project